Tax optimization for Rwandan infrastructure projects: Strategies to stay ahead

Infrastructure projects are one of the key backbones of a country’s economy. In Rwanda, the number of infrastructure developments has risen substantially in recent years, driven by the government’s commitment to transforming the country into a regional logistics and investment hub. As part of its Vision 2050, Rwanda has prioritized large-scale investments and facilitation in urban, transport, energy, and real estate development to support sustainable economic growth.

These infrastructure projects, whether private, public, or public-private partnerships (PPPs), have contributed significantly to Rwanda’s ongoing economic success by elevating the economic potential of surrounding areas, enhancing the country’s competitiveness on the continent, and generating employment opportunities.


Most importantly, from a fiscal perspective, infrastructure projects, particularly in the construction sector, have a measurable impact not only on employment and development but also on government revenue. In fact.
 


While Rwanda does not have a standalone tax law dedicated exclusively to the construction sector, construction activities are governed by the general tax framework including the Income Tax Law, VAT Law, and Tax Procedures Law, as well as by sector-specific incentives under the 2021 Investment Code (Law No. 006/2021) (RDB, 2021).
The construction sector is recognized as a critical enabler of Rwanda’s long-term development agenda, particularly when linked to affordable housing, industrial and innovation park development, and strategic infrastructure within Special Economic Zones (SEZs). As outlined in the 2021 Investment Code, investors operating in these priority sub-sectors may benefit from a suite of fiscal incentives designed to reduce upfront costs and enhance project viability. These include preferential corporate income tax rates as low as 15%, zero-rated VAT on construction materials, exemptions from import duties, and accelerated depreciation allowances of up to 50% in the first year of construction activity. In addition, developers of innovation and industrial parks are eligible for a reduced 10% withholding tax rate on interest, dividends, royalties, and technical service fees, lower than the standard 15% rate. Developers may also benefit from exemptions on property taxes and land transfer fees, depending on the project’s scope and certification.
For public-private partnerships (PPPs) and other large-scale infrastructure initiatives, additional tax incentives may be negotiated directly with the Government of Rwanda, especially where the project qualifies as a 'strategic investment.' Under this framework, investors may submit proposals to the Private Investment Committee (PIC), detailing the expected economic impact, job creation, and financing requirements of the project, among other information. Subject to PIC endorsement and Cabinet approval, these investors may be granted customized incentives such as extended tax holidays, withholding tax exemptions or reductions, and extended or customized tax loss carry-forward treatment, such as longer utilization periods beyond the standard 5 years. This approach allows Rwanda to balance investment promotion with long-term fiscal sustainability while attracting high-impact infrastructure capital.

Despite the availability of various tax incentives, infrastructure developers in Rwanda continue to face a wide range of tax-related compliance failures and challenges.  Many of these compliance failures have been documented in the Rwanda Revenue Authority’s (RRA) 2024-2025 Tax Compliance Improvement Plan (RRA, 2024), which highlights recurring patterns of non-compliance across key sectors. These failures include:
  • Registration and Withholding Tax failures
    • Failure to withhold 15% WHT on payments to unregistered suppliers or casual labourers.
    • Missing registrations in required tax categories (e.g., not registering for PAYE or VAT).
  • VAT and Input tax failures
    • Input VAT claimed without valid EBM invoices or unrelated to taxable activity.
    • Misapplication of VAT reverse charge for foreign services.
    • Failure to apportion VAT in mixed taxable/exempt projects.
  • Filing and expense reporting failures
    • Underreporting of sales or income.
    • Overstatement of cost of goods sold, depreciation, or customs expenses.
    • Expensing personal or undocumented costs.
    • Incorrect loss carry-forward.
  • Payroll and financial reconciliation failures
    • Mismatch between staff costs and PAYE returns.
    • Non-compliance with PAYE on benefits in kind or casual workers.
    • Differences between financial statements and tax returns.
While taxpayer-related compliance gaps are significant, infrastructure developers also face several systemic challenges within Rwanda’s tax administration and regulatory environment. These issues, documented by investors, analysts, and in official reports, can undermine the effectiveness of tax incentives and increase project risk:
  • Delays in VAT refund processing
Although VAT refund regulations require reimbursement within 15 days of receiving supporting documentation, many investors report that VAT refunds take months or even years to process. The delay is often attributed to frequent and lengthy audits conducted by the Rwanda Revenue Authority (RRA), even for compliant firms (ITA, 2024).
  • Occasional coordination gaps between RDB and RRA
Some investors and tax practitioners have observed that securing tax incentives through the Rwanda Development Board (RDB) does not always translate into seamless application with the Rwanda Revenue Authority (RRA). This can result in delays or disputes over eligibility for exemptions, underscoring the need for clearer inter-agency coordination in implementing investment certificates.
  • Double taxation and Incentive limitations in cross-border infrastructure projects
Without a Double Taxation Agreement (DTA) in place, payments to foreign contractors are often taxed again in the contractor’s home country, resulting in unrelieved double taxation. While Rwanda has DTAs with countries such as Belgium and South Africa, it has no active agreements with East African Community (EAC) partners, and the multilateral EAC DTA signed in 2010 remains unratified (RRA, n.d).

Although Rwanda offers generous tax incentives under its Investment Code, these benefits are available only to companies registered in Rwanda. As a result, foreign contractors and service providers (e.g., from Kenya or Tanzania) engaged in infrastructure projects are excluded from these incentives and are subject to a 15% withholding tax on payments received. This tax exposure increases project costs, discourages regional collaboration, and underscores the need for expanded treaty coverage or a more coordinated regional tax framework.

Tax optimization refers to the legal and strategic use of a country’s tax framework to reduce liabilities while remaining fully compliant with applicable laws and regulations (Cornell Law School, 2022). In Rwanda’s infrastructure sector, tax optimization must be understood not just as a cost-saving measure but as a comprehensive process that requires clarity on the entire tax environment.
This article has walked through four of the key dimensions of that environment: the fiscal incentives available under Rwanda’s 2021 Investment Code; the core tax laws and regulatory frameworks; the recurring compliance failures faced by developers; and the systemic challenges that can hinder even well-intentioned tax planning.
Together, these elements form part of the foundation of any serious tax optimization strategy. The following practical strategies are designed to help developers stay ahead, mitigate tax risk, and enhance long-term financial sustainability throughout the project lifecycle.
1. Design projects with tax incentives in mind
Tax optimization begins well before ground is broken. Developers should:
  • Secure investment certification through the Rwanda Development Board (RDB) early to access incentives such as preferential CIT rates (as low as 15%), zero-rated VAT on materials, import duty exemptions, and accelerated depreciation.
  • Position projects within priority sectors like affordable housing, SEZ development, or industrial parks to qualify for maximum benefits.
  • For strategic infrastructure and PPPs, prepare and submit well-supported proposals to the Private Investment Committee (PIC) to access customized tax packages, including tax holidays or WHT reductions.
2.  Embed tax compliance into project operations
Considering the RRA’s 2024–2025 findings on frequent compliance failures, companies must:
  • Ensure full tax registration (VAT, CIT, PAYE, WHT) from the outset.
  • Automate and monitor WHT enforcement on payments to suppliers and service providers, particularly where registration status is uncertain.
  • Transact only with EBM-registered suppliers, ensure proper VAT treatment for foreign services using the reverse charge mechanism, and apply VAT apportionment where activities involve both taxable and exempt components.
  • Reconcile all payroll, expense, and revenue figures across tax filings and financial statements to avoid inconsistencies that trigger audits.
3.    Prepare proactively for RRA engagement
Given the frequency of tax audits even for compliant firms, it is critical to:
  • Maintain audit-ready documentation, especially for input VAT, project expenses, and payroll.
  • Conduct internal tax health checks before major submissions (CIT, VAT).
  • Monitor RRA’s risk indicators (e.g., WHT gaps, VAT refund anomalies) and flag them internally before they are picked up during audits.
4.    Close the gap between incentive approval and implementation
Misalignment between RDB and RRA can cause delays in accessing exemptions or applying approved incentive terms. To mitigate this:
  • Engage local tax advisors with in-depth knowledge of Rwanda’s tax system and institutional processes to support coordination, clarify entitlement, and help bridge communication gaps between agencies.
  • Share investment certificate details and qualifying documents directly with RRA early.
  • Keep detailed records of all communications between government entities regarding tax incentives.
  • Engage both institutions early when projects involve special approvals or customized incentives.
5.    Plan for cross-border tax exposure and DTAs
For infrastructure projects involving regional contractors or foreign service providers:
  • Coordinate cross-border tax planning through advisory firms with regional reach. These firms can support seamless tax advisory for cross-border engagements, helping clients align contract structures, apply for treaty relief, and manage regulatory differences across jurisdictions.
6.    Integrate tax advisory from start to finish
Finally, successful tax optimization is a multidisciplinary effort. Infrastructure developers should:
  • Engage tax professionals during project design to align structures with Rwandan laws and incentives.
  • Leverage advisory support for VAT refund processes, incentive applications, and audit management.
  • Build long-term relationships with tax advisors to stay informed on evolving policy changes, including those affecting SEZs, PPPs, and regional tax treaties.

As Rwanda accelerates infrastructure investments under Vision 2050, the country's fiscal and regulatory landscape continues to evolve. Although no official amendments have been announced to the Investment Code (Law No. 006/2021) or tax legislation at this time, the government's continued focus on industrialization, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and investment promotion indicates that further developments in tax implementation and project facilitation are likely in the coming years.
For infrastructure developers, this means remaining agile, not only in navigating current tax rules but in anticipating policy shifts that could affect project structuring, incentive access, and regulatory compliance.
In this context, the role of qualified tax advisors becomes especially critical. Early engagement ensures that infrastructure projects investors:
  • Structure their investments in a way that maximizes lawful tax incentives
  • Minimize compliance risks around VAT recovery, WHT application, and CIT reporting
  • Navigate the complexities of tax treatment across PPPs, donor-funded infrastructure, and cross-border contracts
  • Stay informed about evolving enforcement priorities and institutional interpretations by both RDB and RRA.
As Rwanda continues strengthening transparency and digitization in tax administration, proactive tax planning and optimization are no longer optional, it is a strategic necessity for infrastructure developers seeking long-term project viability, investor confidence, and regulatory alignment.

At BDO East Africa, we are committed to helping businesses navigate these changes. Contact us for guidance on tax optimization strategies aligned with your project goals. Feel free to contact our advisory team.